Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 418 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $144.51 vs $361.95
- Up to 59% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Ryzen 9 3950X - $1.39 vs $3.38 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 119 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
115
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€160.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €160.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6406 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.38/FPS
41%
Price, €
€401.76
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €401.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6406 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Colfax | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |