Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 643 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $144.51 vs $329.04
- Up to 55% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.59 vs $1.3 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 281 vs 273 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
273
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€160.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €160.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Buy for €365.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Colfax | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |