Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is 657 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 43% cheaper than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - $144.51 vs $252.88
- Up to 42% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - $0.3 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 541 vs 529 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
529
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€160.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €160.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3996 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
541
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
57%
Price, €
€280.7
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €280.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3996 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Colfax | Codename | Renoir |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |