Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 643 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $144.51 vs $286.95
- Up to 43% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 7 3800XT - $0.92 vs $1.61 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 13% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 198 vs 175 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
175
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€160.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €160.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12509 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
57%
Price, €
€318.52
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €318.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12509 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Colfax | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |