Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Ryzen 5 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 95 days older than Ryzen 5 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 12% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 3500U - 56 vs 50 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500U - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
56
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€561.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €561.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Colfax | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 15 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |