Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2171 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 14% better in Minecraft than FX-6300 - 684 vs 600 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $71.68 vs $164.59
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €182.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Buy for €79.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Colfax | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |