Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 516 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 731 vs 705 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $215.7 vs $456.96
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
705
96.44322845417237%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€507.23
47%
Buy for €507.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Buy for €239.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
69.24896510940272%
Multi-Core
7539
93.61728548367068%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |