Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 621 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $456.96 vs $488.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 166 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
157
94.57831325301204%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€507.23
100%
Buy for €507.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Buy for €541.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
72.68777157045314%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |