Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1874 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 27% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 214 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $336.52 vs $421.56
- Up to 37% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.75 vs $2.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
169
78%
Value, €/FPS
€2.77/FPS
63%
Price, €
€467.93
79%
Buy for €467.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€373.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €373.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |