Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1547 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 288 vs 271 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $175.49 vs $456.96
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
271
94.09722222222221%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€507.23
38%
Buy for €507.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Buy for €194.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
46.06608969315499%
Multi-Core
7539
50.661917881862784%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |