Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 113% better in League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 328 vs 154 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $316.59 vs $421.56
- Up to 65% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.07 vs $3.04 per FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
154
46%
Value, €/FPS
€3.04/FPS
35%
Price, €
€467.93
75%
Buy for €467.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
328
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€351.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €351.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |