Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 800 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - $421.56 vs $778.72
- Up to 42% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10980XE - $4.54 vs $7.86 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 7% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 110 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
103
93%
Value, €/FPS
€4.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€467.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €467.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.86/FPS
57%
Price, €
€864.38
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €864.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-10980XE |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Whitehaven | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 18 |
32 | Threads | 36 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |