Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 235 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700T - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 8% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 155 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $145.5 vs $599.06
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
144
92.90322580645162%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€664.96
24%
Buy for €664.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75235 minutes ago
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
88.57791225416037%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |