Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2096 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 21% better in War Thunder than Core i7-3930K - 166 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $142.59 vs $361.14
- Up to 52% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.16 vs $2.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.41/FPS
48%
Price, €
€400.86
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €400.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
137
82%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |