Buy on Amazon
€467.93
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $359
Availability
MSRP in USD: $359
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-14700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2342 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700F - 32 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 14% better in God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 195 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $270.23 vs $421.56
- Up to 44% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.54 vs $2.74 per FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
171
87%
Value, €/FPS
€2.74/FPS
56%
Price, €
€467.93
64%
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for €467.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€299.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-14700F Desktop Processor 20 cores (8 P-cores + 12 E-cores) up to 5.4 GHz
Buy for €299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i7-14700F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 16 | Cores | 20 |
32 | Threads | 28 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.