Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1874 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $162.14 vs $509.62
- Up to 60% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i7-13700K - $0.73 vs $1.83 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700K - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 25% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 309 vs 248 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
248
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€179.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €179.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9505 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
309
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
39%
Price, €
€565.68
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €565.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9504 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |