Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1973 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700F - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 14% better in HITMAN 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 224 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $231.58 vs $599.06
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
197
87.94642857142857%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€664.96
38%
Buy for €664.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75078 minutes ago
Buy for €257.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75076 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
44.00601277715145%
Multi-Core
7539
48.717285945072696%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |