Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-11700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-11700KF is 1314 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i7-11700KF - $162.14 vs $179.78
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11700KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700KF
- Performs up to 26% better in Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 234 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.85 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
185
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
87%
Price, €
€179.98
100%
Buy for €179.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.56
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €199.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-11700KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |