Buy on Amazon
€664.96
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 206 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $157.9 vs $599.06
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
198
96.11650485436894%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€664.96
26%
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for €664.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75177 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-10700KF Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for €175.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i7-10700KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
68.88235294117648%
Multi-Core
7539
93.2698255598169%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.