Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 770 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $49.46 vs $599.06
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €664.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66000 minutes ago
Buy for €54.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66001 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1111
94.87617421007685%
Multi-Core
3023
40.09815625414511%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |