Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1608 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $162.14 vs $658.06
- Up to 63% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-12400F - $1.71 vs $4.68 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 49% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 156 vs 105 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
105
67%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€179.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €179.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15207 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.68/FPS
36%
Price, €
€730.45
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |