Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 19% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 629 vs 529 FPS
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $76.59 vs $599.06
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
529
84.10174880763115%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€664.96
12%
Buy for €664.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76219 minutes ago
Buy for €85.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
59.71443141254462%
Multi-Core
7539
99.09305993690852%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |