Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9350KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9350KF is 516 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 227 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $79.97 vs $361.14
- Up to 80% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.39 vs $1.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 91 vs 180 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
202
88%
Value, €/FPS
€1.98/FPS
19%
Price, €
€400.86
22%
Buy for €400.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €88.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i3-9350KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |