Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2363 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-2120 - 234 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $73.11 vs $456.96
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €507.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 321 minutes ago
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 320 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
501
42.78394534585824%
Multi-Core
1035
13.728611221647432%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i3-2120 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |