Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1874 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $162.14 vs $401.42
- Up to 49% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 9 7950X - $1.06 vs $2.08 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 27% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 214 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 170 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
169
78%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€179.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €179.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14284 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
50%
Price, €
€445.58
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €445.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14284 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |