Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 1983 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 12% better in Death Stranding than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 248 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $269.8 vs $599.06
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
222
89.51612903225806%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€664.96
45%
Buy for €664.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75071 minutes ago
Buy for €299.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75070 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
41.46600566572238%
Multi-Core
7539
45.02777280057337%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |