Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 696 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 4% better in HITMAN 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 205 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $146.23 vs $456.96
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 105 vs 180 Watts
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
197
96.09756097560975%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€507.23
32%
Buy for €507.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Buy for €162.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
69.08554572271386%
Multi-Core
7539
88.71499176276771%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |