Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 252 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $73.1 vs $162.14
- Up to 55% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.68 vs $1.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
45%
Price, €
€179.98
45%
Buy for €179.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3267 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |