Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1752 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than FX-8350 - 171 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 17% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $135.27 vs $162.14
- Up to 12% better value when playing God of War than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.92 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
87%
Price, €
€179.98
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for €179.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7756 minutes ago
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7755 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Whitehaven | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |