Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 392 days older than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Athlon 200GE - 169 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $51.17 vs $421.56
- Up to 87% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.35 vs $2.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.77/FPS
12%
Price, €
€467.93
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €467.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Buy for €56.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |