Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1067 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 95 vs 84 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
95
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€219.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |