Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 809 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $182.8 vs $1096.05
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 4% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 222 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 127 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
213
95.94594594594594%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€202.91
100%
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76785 minutes ago
Buy for €1,216.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76784 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
65.95505617977528%
Multi-Core
6976
81.1540251279665%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 127 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |