Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 516 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $197.42 vs $209.66
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 249 vs 234 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.93 vs $0.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
234
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
98%
Price, €
€219.14
100%
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
249
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€232.72
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €232.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |