Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 1699 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - $182.8 vs $255.18
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 15% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 189 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 150 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
164
86.77248677248677%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€202.91
100%
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74997 minutes ago
Buy for €283.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74996 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
43.61069836552749%
Multi-Core
6976
43.00067804968255%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |