Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 1608 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $171.83 vs $301.2
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 11% better in Deathloop than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 194 vs 175 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
175
90.20618556701031%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€190.73
100%
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
Buy for €334.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
47.472705216336436%
Multi-Core
6976
53.480527445568846%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |