Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Apex Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 292 vs 278 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $153.55 vs $197.42
- Up to 27% better value when playing Apex Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.58 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
278
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
73%
Price, €
€219.14
77%
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18211 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
292
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |