Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 560 vs 526 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $168.17 vs $182.8
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
526
93.92857142857143%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€202.91
91%
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74779 minutes ago
Buy for €186.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74778 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
54.076462459695996%
Multi-Core
6976
76.06585977537891%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |