Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700K is 435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - $197.42 vs $201.17
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700K - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 25% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 180 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 18% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $1.24 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
144
80%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
81%
Price, €
€219.14
100%
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16850 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€223.3
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €223.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16850 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |