Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $197.42 vs $268.02
- Up to 12% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-14700F - $1.21 vs $1.37 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 217 vs 181 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
181
83%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€219.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Buy for €297.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 20 |
24 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |