Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Fortnite than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 229 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $160.13 vs $197.42
- Up to 20% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.78 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
223
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
79%
Price, €
€219.14
81%
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€177.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €177.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |