Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14400 is 2342 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 30% better in New World than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 143 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $168.17 vs $197.42
- Up to 34% better value when playing New World than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $1.31 vs $1.99 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
110
76%
Value, €/FPS
€1.99/FPS
65%
Price, €
€219.14
85%
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13981 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€186.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €186.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13979 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |