Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1874 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13600K - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 207 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $182.79 vs $182.8
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
201
97.10144927536231%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€202.91
99%
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74966 minutes ago
Buy for €202.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74965 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
44.052532833020635%
Multi-Core
6976
46.98275862068966%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 14 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |