Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 219 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $31.27 vs $197.42
- Up to 84% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.29 vs $1.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.81/FPS
16%
Price, €
€219.14
15%
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€34.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €34.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |