Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 709 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 73 vs 72 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $62.15 vs $171.83
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
72
98.63013698630137%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€190.73
36%
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 325 minutes ago
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 325 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |