Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 3013 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Phenom II X4 925 - 307 vs 295 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
307
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€190.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
27.2572402044293%
Multi-Core
930
13.331422018348624%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | May 11th, 2009 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Deneb |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |