Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1137 days newer than Pentium G3250.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Halo Infinite than Pentium G3250 - 158 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 53 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
576
49.31506849315068%
Multi-Core
981
16.931308249913705%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Pentium |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
