Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 495 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $80.42 vs $205.28
- Up to 60% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-9900KF - $0.49 vs $1.23 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 186 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
182
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
186
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
39%
Price, €
€227.86
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €227.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |