Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4771 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1460 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4771.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-4771 - 344 vs 342 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i7-4771 - $80.42 vs $94.32
- Up to 16% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-4771 - $0.26 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4771 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4771
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
344
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16923 minutes ago
Buy for €104.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16923 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-4771 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |