Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700K is 1526 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-12700K - $80.42 vs $157.2
- Up to 41% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-12700K - $0.22 vs $0.37 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 470 vs 403 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
403
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
470
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
59%
Price, €
€174.49
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €174.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-12700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |