Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1917 days newer than Core i5-3470.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-3470 - 103 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €55.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74985 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
622
53.25342465753424%
Multi-Core
1840
31.756989989644456%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |