Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 2238 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - $80.42 vs $214.96
- Up to 52% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-14600KF - $0.5 vs $1.05 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 28% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 227 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 20 vs 16 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
178
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
47%
Price, €
€238.61
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €238.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |